Key fingerprint 9EF0 C41A FBA5 64AA 650A 0259 9C6D CD17 283E 454C

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
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=5a6T
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

		

Contact

If you need help using Tor you can contact WikiLeaks for assistance in setting it up using our simple webchat available at: https://wikileaks.org/talk

If you can use Tor, but need to contact WikiLeaks for other reasons use our secured webchat available at http://wlchatc3pjwpli5r.onion

We recommend contacting us over Tor if you can.

Tor

Tor is an encrypted anonymising network that makes it harder to intercept internet communications, or see where communications are coming from or going to.

In order to use the WikiLeaks public submission system as detailed above you can download the Tor Browser Bundle, which is a Firefox-like browser available for Windows, Mac OS X and GNU/Linux and pre-configured to connect using the anonymising system Tor.

Tails

If you are at high risk and you have the capacity to do so, you can also access the submission system through a secure operating system called Tails. Tails is an operating system launched from a USB stick or a DVD that aim to leaves no traces when the computer is shut down after use and automatically routes your internet traffic through Tor. Tails will require you to have either a USB stick or a DVD at least 4GB big and a laptop or desktop computer.

Tips

Our submission system works hard to preserve your anonymity, but we recommend you also take some of your own precautions. Please review these basic guidelines.

1. Contact us if you have specific problems

If you have a very large submission, or a submission with a complex format, or are a high-risk source, please contact us. In our experience it is always possible to find a custom solution for even the most seemingly difficult situations.

2. What computer to use

If the computer you are uploading from could subsequently be audited in an investigation, consider using a computer that is not easily tied to you. Technical users can also use Tails to help ensure you do not leave any records of your submission on the computer.

3. Do not talk about your submission to others

If you have any issues talk to WikiLeaks. We are the global experts in source protection – it is a complex field. Even those who mean well often do not have the experience or expertise to advise properly. This includes other media organisations.

After

1. Do not talk about your submission to others

If you have any issues talk to WikiLeaks. We are the global experts in source protection – it is a complex field. Even those who mean well often do not have the experience or expertise to advise properly. This includes other media organisations.

2. Act normal

If you are a high-risk source, avoid saying anything or doing anything after submitting which might promote suspicion. In particular, you should try to stick to your normal routine and behaviour.

3. Remove traces of your submission

If you are a high-risk source and the computer you prepared your submission on, or uploaded it from, could subsequently be audited in an investigation, we recommend that you format and dispose of the computer hard drive and any other storage media you used.

In particular, hard drives retain data after formatting which may be visible to a digital forensics team and flash media (USB sticks, memory cards and SSD drives) retain data even after a secure erasure. If you used flash media to store sensitive data, it is important to destroy the media.

If you do this and are a high-risk source you should make sure there are no traces of the clean-up, since such traces themselves may draw suspicion.

4. If you face legal action

If a legal action is brought against you as a result of your submission, there are organisations that may help you. The Courage Foundation is an international organisation dedicated to the protection of journalistic sources. You can find more details at https://www.couragefound.org.

WikiLeaks publishes documents of political or historical importance that are censored or otherwise suppressed. We specialise in strategic global publishing and large archives.

The following is the address of our secure site where you can anonymously upload your documents to WikiLeaks editors. You can only access this submissions system through Tor. (See our Tor tab for more information.) We also advise you to read our tips for sources before submitting.

http://ibfckmpsmylhbfovflajicjgldsqpc75k5w454irzwlh7qifgglncbad.onion

If you cannot use Tor, or your submission is very large, or you have specific requirements, WikiLeaks provides several alternative methods. Contact us to discuss how to proceed.

WikiLeaks
Press release About PlusD
 
Content
Show Headers
B. 05 LJUBLJANA 0724 C. LJUBLJANA 0058 1. (U) SUMMARY: Senior Advisor for Biotechnology Madelyn Spirnak's 22-23 February visit was a significant step in moving forward Slovenia's ongoing ag-biotech coexistence debate. Spirnak met with members of the Parliamentary Agriculture Council, Senior Agriculture Ministry officials and staff who are currently drafting coexistence legislation, NGO representatives, senior executives from Slovenia's largest poultry and corn producer, leaders of the Slovene Farmer's Union, and biotech specialists from the University of Ljubljana. During her visit, Spirnak was also interviewed by one of the largest Slovene daily newspapers and a weekly lifestyle magazine. The visit was an excellent opportunity for Spirnak to see first hand the political challenges of introducing biotech crops in Slovenia, but also to hear that the government is taking a pragmatic approach to developing its coexistence policies. Spirnak also heard that, as with other EU member states, the level of understanding of GMOs and the potential benefits they can bring are not well understood by the average Slovene citizen. Post believes that this visit contributed significantly to our overall strategy of encouraging Slovenia to adopt a science-based approach to coexistence and to enable a full range of choices for the Slovene farmer and consumer. End Summary. ---------------------------- Slovenian Biotech Challenges ---------------------------- 2. (U) Similar to other countries in the European Union, there is a general perception in Slovenia that GMOs can have harmful effects on the environment and those who consume them. Nearly all contacts met during Spirnak's visit said the public has an often visceral and uninformed reaction to biased media reports designed to inflame fears. The most significant roadblock to achieving a balanced policy on coexistence and, certainly, on ultimately raising GMO crops, is the strongly negative view held by the general public. 3. (U) As is typically the case with ag biotech in other countries, the level of understanding in Slovenia about potential risks and benefits is very low. Surveys performed by the Slovenian Agricultural Institute have shown in the past that a majority of Slovenes do not understand what genetic characteristics are and believe that the food that they consume does not contain genes at all. Fearmongering in the press by the organic farming community and NGOs only serve to further confuse the public. Nearly all of Spirnak's counterparts during her visit noted that the most significant challenge to ag biotech in Slovenia will be educating the Slovene public. In addition, the director of the Slovene Farmer's Union told Spirnak that farmers also need to be educated about the real benefits that ag biotech can bring to their businesses. He noted that while Slovene farmers know that ag-biotech exists, there is an opportunity to reach out, particularly to larger agribusinesses. (Note: In ref C, in an effort to support this outreach, Post requested biotech funds from EB/TPP/ABT to support publication and distribution of Slovene language ag biotech educational materials. End Note.) 4. (U) The relatively small size of Slovenian farms (on average, 5-10 hectares) is another challenge to ag-biotech and coexistence that was raised frequently during Spirnak's visit. Many of Post's more skeptical contacts said they felt coexistence of biotech crops along with conventional and organic was simply not feasible with such small plots. In Slovenia, only a handful of farms are larger than 100 hectares and most are less than 25. Opponents of biotechnology also argued that any cost savings or efficiency benefits from using ag biotech would accrue to such a small LJUBLJANA 00000141 002 OF 003 percentage of the farming community that it would not be worthwhile. (Note: Farmer's Union members told Spirnak, however, that the large farms that do exist in Slovenia would likely be interested in biotech solutions. End note.) ---------------------- Preference For Organic ---------------------- 5. (U) Slovenia has joined an informal coalition with Austria and Italy to grow only organic crops in certain areas of the difficult terrain of the sub-Alpine region near the shared borders of the three countries. Contacts at the Agriculture Ministry and elsewhere have told Post that this agreement bans growing of ag biotech crops in the region. We understand that there is a long-term plan to increase organic production in Slovenia from its current level of approximately 3 percent of total farming to 10 percent. Moreover, ag interlocutors tell us that Slovenia has negotiated a rural development plan with the EU to support "traditional" farming, including organic techniques. This plan, which provides subsidies to farmers who follow all of its rules and guidelines, prohibits the use of GMOs. The program is widespread, with tens of thousands of Slovene farmers (including the head of the Farmer's Union) taking part. NGOs and other anti-biotech groups point to this and allege that GMOs have no place in Slovenia. 6. (U) Major Slovene food producers, however, have told Post that while consumers might express a theoretical preference for organic grown crops, it is unlikely that the share of organic consumption will grow significantly beyond its current level due to the much higher cost of these products. Moreover, the larger farms in Slovenia which would potentially benefit from the introduction of biotech crops are a significant distance from the "organic region." ------------------ The Pragmatic View ------------------ 7. (U) In spite of the challenges of creating an effective coexistence policy framework and introducing biotech crops, high-level contacts at the Ministry of Agriculture say that enabling choice and adopting EU legislation are the main goals in the drafting of coexistence legislation. Franc But, State Secretary (Deputy Minister) at the Ministry of Agriculture, repeating a mantra he has said in both public and private fora (refs A and B), told Spirnak that he was committed to ensuring that EU rules on coexistence are adopted and that this included ensuring farmers and consumers have the free right to choose which kinds of food to grow and consume. While But is ahead of the public opinion curve on this matter, he is an important supporter of a science-based approach to coexistence and understands the needs and demands of the farming community as well as consumers. 8. (U) Most sensitive to the discussion of ag biotech are Slovene food producers. As with the Agriculture Ministry, large producers seem to be taking a pragmatic view of biotechnology and recognize its advantages as well as its inevitability. Nada Krajnc, Director of Marketing for Perutnina Ptuj, Slovenia's largest poultry and corn producer (and supplier of chicken nuggets to McDonald's), told Spirnak that Perutnina will adopt ag biotech as a feed source "when it makes business sense." Referring to the dramatic, negative impact on sales in Slovenia of a recent, minor incident of unintended presence of GMOs in feed used in production of meat products in Croatia, Krajnc noted that it would be necessary to introduce GMO products very carefully and with a concerted effort to educate consumers by both private business and the GOS. In addition, Krajnc also pointed out that it would be critical for this educational process to start in the near future as acquiring non-GM soya feed for Perutnina chickens was becoming very difficult and LJUBLJANA 00000141 003 OF 003 expensive. As an executive at a large agricultural concern, Krajnc understands the financial benefits ag biotech can bring and could prove to be a key advocate in encouraging a balanced coexistence policy. --------------------- Process Going Forward --------------------- 9. (U) Spirnak's visit helped Post to keep ag coexistence on the front burner of the GOS's agenda. Ag State Secretary But and others have said that efforts such as the October 2005 coexistence conference (ref B) and visits by senior USG officials have helped to move policy discussion forward. During Spirnak's visit we learned that the Agriculture Ministry is "nearly finished" with a first draft of coexistence legislation. Once this document is finished, it will be sent through the interagency process where other key contributors (in particular, the Ministries of Environment and Health) will have an opportunity to suggest changes. Post understands that at this point, there will also be opportunity for public and interest group commentary. The Agriculture Ministry tells us that it expects the legislation to be sent to Parliament by the fall of 2006. ------- Comment ------- 10. (U) Despite the challenges that face the future of ag biotech in Slovenia, senior government officials and businesspeople appear to be sticking to a pragmatic approach to the technology. If the attitude of "GMOs are unavoidable, we have to figure out a way to deal with them" is less than an open-armed greeting, on balance, it seems more welcoming than what we hear from Slovenia's Austrian, Croatian, and Italian neighbors. Senior Slovene ag contacts tell us that our coexistence conference in October 2005 (ref B) was a critical step in kicking off the debate within Slovenia and helped move the legislative process forward. Spirnak's visit was another significant step in keeping the debate alive. Her visit enabled us to discuss this matter with all of the key players in the GOS and agriculture industry. While we do not expect Slovenia to adopt GMOs without some serious and contentious debate, Spirnak's visit was a key part of our overall strategy to encourage Slovenia to develop a science-based set of rules that allows farmers and consumers to choose. End comment. 11. (U) Madelyn Spirnak has cleared this message. ROBERTSON

Raw content
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 LJUBLJANA 000141 SIPDIS SIPDIS DEPT FOR EUR/NCE, EUR/ERA, EB/CBA, EB/TPP/ABT DEPT PLEASE PASS TO USTR/ERRION AMEMBASSY TALLINN FOR KELLY ADAMS-SMITH AMEMBASSY VIENNA PLEASE PASS TO FAS FAS PLEASE PASS TO OA/BEV SIMMONS AND ELIZABETH JONES COMMERCE FOR ITA/SAVICH TREASURY FOR VIMAL ATUKORALA E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: EAGR, ECON, ETRD, SI SUBJECT: SLOVENIA: VISIT OF MADELYN SPIRNAK HELPS MOVE COEXISTENCE DEBATE FORWARD REF: A. 05 LJUBLJANA 0106 B. 05 LJUBLJANA 0724 C. LJUBLJANA 0058 1. (U) SUMMARY: Senior Advisor for Biotechnology Madelyn Spirnak's 22-23 February visit was a significant step in moving forward Slovenia's ongoing ag-biotech coexistence debate. Spirnak met with members of the Parliamentary Agriculture Council, Senior Agriculture Ministry officials and staff who are currently drafting coexistence legislation, NGO representatives, senior executives from Slovenia's largest poultry and corn producer, leaders of the Slovene Farmer's Union, and biotech specialists from the University of Ljubljana. During her visit, Spirnak was also interviewed by one of the largest Slovene daily newspapers and a weekly lifestyle magazine. The visit was an excellent opportunity for Spirnak to see first hand the political challenges of introducing biotech crops in Slovenia, but also to hear that the government is taking a pragmatic approach to developing its coexistence policies. Spirnak also heard that, as with other EU member states, the level of understanding of GMOs and the potential benefits they can bring are not well understood by the average Slovene citizen. Post believes that this visit contributed significantly to our overall strategy of encouraging Slovenia to adopt a science-based approach to coexistence and to enable a full range of choices for the Slovene farmer and consumer. End Summary. ---------------------------- Slovenian Biotech Challenges ---------------------------- 2. (U) Similar to other countries in the European Union, there is a general perception in Slovenia that GMOs can have harmful effects on the environment and those who consume them. Nearly all contacts met during Spirnak's visit said the public has an often visceral and uninformed reaction to biased media reports designed to inflame fears. The most significant roadblock to achieving a balanced policy on coexistence and, certainly, on ultimately raising GMO crops, is the strongly negative view held by the general public. 3. (U) As is typically the case with ag biotech in other countries, the level of understanding in Slovenia about potential risks and benefits is very low. Surveys performed by the Slovenian Agricultural Institute have shown in the past that a majority of Slovenes do not understand what genetic characteristics are and believe that the food that they consume does not contain genes at all. Fearmongering in the press by the organic farming community and NGOs only serve to further confuse the public. Nearly all of Spirnak's counterparts during her visit noted that the most significant challenge to ag biotech in Slovenia will be educating the Slovene public. In addition, the director of the Slovene Farmer's Union told Spirnak that farmers also need to be educated about the real benefits that ag biotech can bring to their businesses. He noted that while Slovene farmers know that ag-biotech exists, there is an opportunity to reach out, particularly to larger agribusinesses. (Note: In ref C, in an effort to support this outreach, Post requested biotech funds from EB/TPP/ABT to support publication and distribution of Slovene language ag biotech educational materials. End Note.) 4. (U) The relatively small size of Slovenian farms (on average, 5-10 hectares) is another challenge to ag-biotech and coexistence that was raised frequently during Spirnak's visit. Many of Post's more skeptical contacts said they felt coexistence of biotech crops along with conventional and organic was simply not feasible with such small plots. In Slovenia, only a handful of farms are larger than 100 hectares and most are less than 25. Opponents of biotechnology also argued that any cost savings or efficiency benefits from using ag biotech would accrue to such a small LJUBLJANA 00000141 002 OF 003 percentage of the farming community that it would not be worthwhile. (Note: Farmer's Union members told Spirnak, however, that the large farms that do exist in Slovenia would likely be interested in biotech solutions. End note.) ---------------------- Preference For Organic ---------------------- 5. (U) Slovenia has joined an informal coalition with Austria and Italy to grow only organic crops in certain areas of the difficult terrain of the sub-Alpine region near the shared borders of the three countries. Contacts at the Agriculture Ministry and elsewhere have told Post that this agreement bans growing of ag biotech crops in the region. We understand that there is a long-term plan to increase organic production in Slovenia from its current level of approximately 3 percent of total farming to 10 percent. Moreover, ag interlocutors tell us that Slovenia has negotiated a rural development plan with the EU to support "traditional" farming, including organic techniques. This plan, which provides subsidies to farmers who follow all of its rules and guidelines, prohibits the use of GMOs. The program is widespread, with tens of thousands of Slovene farmers (including the head of the Farmer's Union) taking part. NGOs and other anti-biotech groups point to this and allege that GMOs have no place in Slovenia. 6. (U) Major Slovene food producers, however, have told Post that while consumers might express a theoretical preference for organic grown crops, it is unlikely that the share of organic consumption will grow significantly beyond its current level due to the much higher cost of these products. Moreover, the larger farms in Slovenia which would potentially benefit from the introduction of biotech crops are a significant distance from the "organic region." ------------------ The Pragmatic View ------------------ 7. (U) In spite of the challenges of creating an effective coexistence policy framework and introducing biotech crops, high-level contacts at the Ministry of Agriculture say that enabling choice and adopting EU legislation are the main goals in the drafting of coexistence legislation. Franc But, State Secretary (Deputy Minister) at the Ministry of Agriculture, repeating a mantra he has said in both public and private fora (refs A and B), told Spirnak that he was committed to ensuring that EU rules on coexistence are adopted and that this included ensuring farmers and consumers have the free right to choose which kinds of food to grow and consume. While But is ahead of the public opinion curve on this matter, he is an important supporter of a science-based approach to coexistence and understands the needs and demands of the farming community as well as consumers. 8. (U) Most sensitive to the discussion of ag biotech are Slovene food producers. As with the Agriculture Ministry, large producers seem to be taking a pragmatic view of biotechnology and recognize its advantages as well as its inevitability. Nada Krajnc, Director of Marketing for Perutnina Ptuj, Slovenia's largest poultry and corn producer (and supplier of chicken nuggets to McDonald's), told Spirnak that Perutnina will adopt ag biotech as a feed source "when it makes business sense." Referring to the dramatic, negative impact on sales in Slovenia of a recent, minor incident of unintended presence of GMOs in feed used in production of meat products in Croatia, Krajnc noted that it would be necessary to introduce GMO products very carefully and with a concerted effort to educate consumers by both private business and the GOS. In addition, Krajnc also pointed out that it would be critical for this educational process to start in the near future as acquiring non-GM soya feed for Perutnina chickens was becoming very difficult and LJUBLJANA 00000141 003 OF 003 expensive. As an executive at a large agricultural concern, Krajnc understands the financial benefits ag biotech can bring and could prove to be a key advocate in encouraging a balanced coexistence policy. --------------------- Process Going Forward --------------------- 9. (U) Spirnak's visit helped Post to keep ag coexistence on the front burner of the GOS's agenda. Ag State Secretary But and others have said that efforts such as the October 2005 coexistence conference (ref B) and visits by senior USG officials have helped to move policy discussion forward. During Spirnak's visit we learned that the Agriculture Ministry is "nearly finished" with a first draft of coexistence legislation. Once this document is finished, it will be sent through the interagency process where other key contributors (in particular, the Ministries of Environment and Health) will have an opportunity to suggest changes. Post understands that at this point, there will also be opportunity for public and interest group commentary. The Agriculture Ministry tells us that it expects the legislation to be sent to Parliament by the fall of 2006. ------- Comment ------- 10. (U) Despite the challenges that face the future of ag biotech in Slovenia, senior government officials and businesspeople appear to be sticking to a pragmatic approach to the technology. If the attitude of "GMOs are unavoidable, we have to figure out a way to deal with them" is less than an open-armed greeting, on balance, it seems more welcoming than what we hear from Slovenia's Austrian, Croatian, and Italian neighbors. Senior Slovene ag contacts tell us that our coexistence conference in October 2005 (ref B) was a critical step in kicking off the debate within Slovenia and helped move the legislative process forward. Spirnak's visit was another significant step in keeping the debate alive. Her visit enabled us to discuss this matter with all of the key players in the GOS and agriculture industry. While we do not expect Slovenia to adopt GMOs without some serious and contentious debate, Spirnak's visit was a key part of our overall strategy to encourage Slovenia to develop a science-based set of rules that allows farmers and consumers to choose. End comment. 11. (U) Madelyn Spirnak has cleared this message. ROBERTSON
Metadata
VZCZCXRO7268 PP RUEHAG RUEHDA RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG DE RUEHLJ #0141/01 0620754 ZNR UUUUU ZZH P 030754Z MAR 06 FM AMEMBASSY LJUBLJANA TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4633 INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUEHVB/AMEMBASSY ZAGREB PRIORITY 2293 RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC PRIORITY RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHDC PRIORITY RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC PRIORITY RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY RUEKDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
Print

You can use this tool to generate a print-friendly PDF of the document 06LJUBLJANA141_a.





Share

The formal reference of this document is 06LJUBLJANA141_a, please use it for anything written about this document. This will permit you and others to search for it.


Submit this story


References to this document in other cables References in this document to other cables
06LJUBLJANA577

If the reference is ambiguous all possibilities are listed.

Help Expand The Public Library of US Diplomacy

Your role is important:
WikiLeaks maintains its robust independence through your contributions.

Please see
https://shop.wikileaks.org/donate to learn about all ways to donate.


e-Highlighter

Click to send permalink to address bar, or right-click to copy permalink.

Tweet these highlights

Un-highlight all Un-highlight selectionu Highlight selectionh

XHelp Expand The Public
Library of US Diplomacy

Your role is important:
WikiLeaks maintains its robust independence through your contributions.

Please see
https://shop.wikileaks.org/donate to learn about all ways to donate.