C O N F I D E N T I A L USUN NEW YORK 000530
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/25/2019
TAGS: PREL, PHUM, ETTC, MCAP, UNSC, KN
SUBJECT: UNSC CONDEMNS NUCLEAR TEST; BEGINS WORK ON
RESOLUTION
Classified By: Ambassador Rice for Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
1. (C) Begin Summary. The Security Council roundly condemned
North Korea's nuclear test in brief consultations following a
P5 plus South Korea and Japan discussion, in which all
delegations but China were prepared to agree to a formal
Council press statement. The P5 2 ultimately agreed to
elements to be read to the press by the Council president.
During Council consultations, all members agreed to the
elements and most explicitly agreed to start work immediately
on a timely resolution in response to North Korea's actions.
Many delegations also called for the DPRK to return to the
Six-Party process and some also emphasized the importance of
bringing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) into force.
End Summary.
2. (C) In a brief bilateral meeting on May 25 (held right
before a meeting with the P5 plus South Korea and Japan),
Chinese PR Zhang told Ambassador Rice that he did not have
authorization from Beijing to agree to a formal Security
Council press statement today but agreed that work on a new
Security Council resolution in response to the DPRK nuclear
test should begin immediately.
3. (C) In the P5 2 meeting that followed, Ambassador Rice
emphasized that most of their governments had issued strong
statements condemning the test. She said the Council must
make a strong, clear press statement today indicating that it
is getting to work on a strong Chapter VII resolution
containing appropriate measures that will be finished this
week.
4. (C) While all delegations agreed on the need for a strong
reaction, China said it was not prepared to support a press
statement today. Chinese PR Zhang repeated what he had told
Ambassador Rice beforehand, namely that he was not authorized
to negotiate language for a formal press statement, that he
needed to seek concurrence from Beijing, and that he could
not have an answer until tomorrow. He opposed using the word
"condemn" in any initial statement by the Council. In order
to gain Chinese concurrence on a condemnation of the
detonation, Russian PR and Security Council President Churkin
proposed that he make agreed remarks to the press (as opposed
to issuing a paper statement). After considerable prodding
around the table, Zhang finally agreed to that format. That
text was then presented to the full Council in consultations.
5. (C) At the beginning of the Security Council meeting,
Russian PR Churkin, in his capacity as Council President,
indicated that interested parties had met prior to
consultations and agreed to elements for press remarks, which
he distributed to the Council (see para 8 for full press
remarks). Ambassador Rice reiterated that the nuclear test
constituted a clear violation of UNSCR 1718. She urged the
Council to react strongly and swiftly in order to demonstrate
that the DPRK cannot flout international law and its actions
will have concrete consequences. Most delegations condemned
North Korea's nuclear test and offered clear support for
press remarks following the meeting and for immediate
discussions on a Security Council resolution on the matter;
including France, the UK, Austria, Mexico, Turkey, Uganda,
Burkina Faso, Libya, Croatia and Costa Rica.
6. (C) Chinese PR Zhang expressed "firm opposition" to the
incident (adhering to the Chinese MFA statement) and called
on the DPRK to stop related actions and return to the
Six-Party process. He cautioned the Council to "carefully
consider" its approach to maintaining stability in the Korean
peninsula. Vietnamese PR Le expressed "deep concern" and
called on the regime to exercise maximum restraint, adding
that any reaction by the Council should be unified. Russian
PR Churkin "condemned" the incident and called it a "serious
strike" against the strength of the NPT and the CTBT. He
noted that Russia continued to believe that the broader
situation of a nuclear-free peninsula could only be resolved
in the Six-Party framework.
7. (C) Many delegations called on the DPRK to return to the
Six-Party process and observe international law, including
previous resolutions and statements by the Council. Some
delegations also emphasized the importance of bringing the
CTBT into force. All delegations supported the press
remarks, which were delivered to the press after the meeting
closed by Council President, Russian PR Churkin, and
distributed on paper to the press thereafter by the Russian
delegation.
8. (U) BEGIN PRESS REMARKS:
"The members of the Security Council voiced their strong
opposition to and condemnation of the nuclear test conducted
by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) on 25 May
2009, which constitutes a clear violation of resolution 1718
(2006).
"The members of the Security Council demand that the DPRK
comply fully with its obligations under resolutions 1695
(2006) and 1781 (2006) and other related Security Council
resolutions and statements, and calls on all member states to
uphold their obligations under these resolutions and
statements.
"The members of the Security Council have decided to start
work immediately on a Security Council resolution on this
matter in accordance with the Security Council's
responsibilities under the Charter of the United Nations."
END PRESS REMARKS.
RICE