Key fingerprint 9EF0 C41A FBA5 64AA 650A 0259 9C6D CD17 283E 454C

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
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=5a6T
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

		

Contact

If you need help using Tor you can contact WikiLeaks for assistance in setting it up using our simple webchat available at: https://wikileaks.org/talk

If you can use Tor, but need to contact WikiLeaks for other reasons use our secured webchat available at http://wlchatc3pjwpli5r.onion

We recommend contacting us over Tor if you can.

Tor

Tor is an encrypted anonymising network that makes it harder to intercept internet communications, or see where communications are coming from or going to.

In order to use the WikiLeaks public submission system as detailed above you can download the Tor Browser Bundle, which is a Firefox-like browser available for Windows, Mac OS X and GNU/Linux and pre-configured to connect using the anonymising system Tor.

Tails

If you are at high risk and you have the capacity to do so, you can also access the submission system through a secure operating system called Tails. Tails is an operating system launched from a USB stick or a DVD that aim to leaves no traces when the computer is shut down after use and automatically routes your internet traffic through Tor. Tails will require you to have either a USB stick or a DVD at least 4GB big and a laptop or desktop computer.

Tips

Our submission system works hard to preserve your anonymity, but we recommend you also take some of your own precautions. Please review these basic guidelines.

1. Contact us if you have specific problems

If you have a very large submission, or a submission with a complex format, or are a high-risk source, please contact us. In our experience it is always possible to find a custom solution for even the most seemingly difficult situations.

2. What computer to use

If the computer you are uploading from could subsequently be audited in an investigation, consider using a computer that is not easily tied to you. Technical users can also use Tails to help ensure you do not leave any records of your submission on the computer.

3. Do not talk about your submission to others

If you have any issues talk to WikiLeaks. We are the global experts in source protection – it is a complex field. Even those who mean well often do not have the experience or expertise to advise properly. This includes other media organisations.

After

1. Do not talk about your submission to others

If you have any issues talk to WikiLeaks. We are the global experts in source protection – it is a complex field. Even those who mean well often do not have the experience or expertise to advise properly. This includes other media organisations.

2. Act normal

If you are a high-risk source, avoid saying anything or doing anything after submitting which might promote suspicion. In particular, you should try to stick to your normal routine and behaviour.

3. Remove traces of your submission

If you are a high-risk source and the computer you prepared your submission on, or uploaded it from, could subsequently be audited in an investigation, we recommend that you format and dispose of the computer hard drive and any other storage media you used.

In particular, hard drives retain data after formatting which may be visible to a digital forensics team and flash media (USB sticks, memory cards and SSD drives) retain data even after a secure erasure. If you used flash media to store sensitive data, it is important to destroy the media.

If you do this and are a high-risk source you should make sure there are no traces of the clean-up, since such traces themselves may draw suspicion.

4. If you face legal action

If a legal action is brought against you as a result of your submission, there are organisations that may help you. The Courage Foundation is an international organisation dedicated to the protection of journalistic sources. You can find more details at https://www.couragefound.org.

WikiLeaks publishes documents of political or historical importance that are censored or otherwise suppressed. We specialise in strategic global publishing and large archives.

The following is the address of our secure site where you can anonymously upload your documents to WikiLeaks editors. You can only access this submissions system through Tor. (See our Tor tab for more information.) We also advise you to read our tips for sources before submitting.

http://ibfckmpsmylhbfovflajicjgldsqpc75k5w454irzwlh7qifgglncbad.onion

If you cannot use Tor, or your submission is very large, or you have specific requirements, WikiLeaks provides several alternative methods. Contact us to discuss how to proceed.

WikiLeaks
Press release About PlusD
 
MCGILL CONFERENCE OFFERS PERSPECTIVES ON NEW MEDIA AND COPYRIGHT REFORM
2007 March 31, 13:49 (Saturday)
07MONTREAL150_a
UNCLASSIFIED,FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED,FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
-- Not Assigned --

11593
-- Not Assigned --
TEXT ONLINE
-- Not Assigned --
TE - Telegram (cable)
-- N/A or Blank --

-- N/A or Blank --
-- Not Assigned --
-- Not Assigned --


Content
Show Headers
Copyright Reform This message is Sensitive but Unclassified ------- Summary ------- 1. (SBU) A conference on music and copyright issues entitled "Musical Myopia, Digital Dystopia: New Media and Copyright Reform," hosted by McGill University on March 23, brought together a number of experts in the field of digital rights management and musical technology to discuss the current challenges facing the music industry and the evolving role of intellectual property rights in new media. The conference featured participation from Ann Chaitovitz, Attorney-Advisor at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Bruce Lehman, former Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks in the Clinton Administration, and Michael Geist, a law professor at the University of Ottawa, among others. While Geist's remarks about the adequacy of current Canadian legislation were predictable (Geist is an oft-quoted critic of the Special 301 report and other efforts to encourage Canada to adopt stronger IPR protection), Lehman's comments about the inefficacy of the Digital Media Copyright Act came as a surprise. Although movie piracy (specifically camcording) in Montreal has received widespread press coverage in recent months, the issue of copyright protection for music (and technical protection measures in general) also remains a hot issue. Ms. Chaitovitz underscored how U.S. copyright law evolved to incorporate new media, explained the difference between rights limitations and access limitations within U.S. copyright law, and offered examples of how consumers have benefited from copyright protection by being able to pay more selectively for the services they want. The points of view expressed by some participants have been used to justify GOC resistance to changing its copyright legislation and ratifying the WIPO Internet Treaties. Some conference participants stated that copyright issues remain oversimplified by policymakers and misunderstood by the general public. Post will continue to engage stakeholders in multiple sectors about the importance of implementing the WIPO internet treaties. ------------- Canada's IPR "Public Intellectual" rails against anti-circumvention ------------ 2. (SBU) Geist, regarded by some academics as Canada's "public intellectual" on intellectual property issues and internet law, has published a number of editorials casting doubt on figures related to Canada's share of global film piracy. Geist maintains a blog in which he tackles issues related to new technologies and their legal ramifications and intellectual property issues more generally and has argued against the inclusion of anti-circumvention provisions in Canadian law (see http://www.michaelgeist.ca/index.php). Such provisions, which exist in U.S. law, would ban the manufacture of devices that could be used to "pick digital locks." Geist made a "case against Canadian Anti-Circumvention legislation," contending that anti-circumvention devices are harmful, run counter to the free market, are ineffective, and are unnecessary. 3. (SBU) Geist outlined the changes occurring in the world of digital media on the internet, such as the presence of 70 million blogs, the development of services such as myspace, youtube, webcasts and podcasts that all facilitated audio and video file sharing, to conclude that "those involved in WIPO guessed wrong" about the need to control digital copying. Geist stated that anti-circumvention devices could be harmful to the software and materials they were created to protect. He also said that many Canadian artists do not want to see legislation enacted that would facilitate lawsuits against fans. Geist pointed to the creation of the Canadian Music Creators' Coalition, which claims to be a "growing coalition of Canadian music creators who share the common goal of having our voices heard about the laws and policies that affect our livelihoods," including artists such as Sarah McLaughlan, Avril Lavigne, and the Barenaked Ladies, as evidence of this trend. Some music groups, such as Broken Social Scene, have credited new technology and file sharing mechanisms for facilitating their popularity. ------- An architect of the DMCA proclaims a "post-copyright" era ------- 4. (SBU) Mr. Lehman, one of the self-proclaimed "architects" of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) as well as the WIPO Internet treaties, stated that the music world has entered the "post-copyright era" and that existing copyright mechanisms had failed to respond to the evolution of the internet. Mr. Lehman's comments could be interpreted narrowly to mean that the "copyright" MONTREAL 00000150 002 OF 003 era has come to a close because the genie of digital music is already out of the copyright bottle. Lehman went on to say that Canada should not be constrained by what was done in the United States and blasted the U.S. government process. He said that under U.S. law, individuals are held responsible for file-sharing activities because the big corporations, like the internet service providers (ISPs), lobbied to exempt themselves. He suggested that Canada take a new approach that allegedly could not have been accomplished in the U.S. because of powerful interests, and urging Canada to play an outside role as a cauldron of creativity and culture. --------- Defending the DMCA -------- 5. (SBU) Ms. Chaitovitz stressed the need for the prohibition in manufacture and trafficking of circumvention devices, and noted that such prohibition leads to more effective and less intrusive enforcement of copyright infringement. With regard to technological protection measures, Ms. Chaitovitz said that U.S. law does not require creators to install such devices in their products, and that individual enterprises decide if they wish to protect their material in this way. She also made the distinction between rights limitations and access limitations, with rights controls limiting what consumers can do with purchased materials and access controls determining which consumers can gain access to a particular product or service through subscription services. Ms. Chaitovitz noted that many new digital business models offering consumers more choice and flexibility (such as music subscription services or Netflix offering access to on-demand-streaming movies) rely on access controls. She stated that content owners will be more willing to provide such services only if they are confident that their rights will be protected. Ms. Chaitovitz stressed aspects of U.S. copyright protections work well, and how such protections have benefited consumers, artists, and content providers alike. 6. (SBU) Charles Morgan, a lawyer for McCarthy Tetrault, made the case for Canada to ratify the WIPO internet treaties and bring itself up to the "international standard" for copyright protection. He noted that the massive technological changes the world has undergone had brought about an "imbalance in traditional copyright" and that copyright protection is necessary in order to ensure those who create works are paid for their efforts. Canada, he said, should "act in a manner consistent with all of its trading partners," including the U.S. and the EU, by amending its laws to conform with WIPO requirements. Morgan also noted that Bill C-60, which the GOC had proposed but not adopted in 2005 under the Liberal government, would have ranked among the developed world world's weakest WIPO-implementing legislation. Geist responded to Morgan's remarks by noting that Canadians "must be very clear about what commitments we took on by signing [WIPO]-none." ------- Copyright and the GOC ------- 7. (SBU) Sunny Handa, a conference moderator and McGill Law Professor noted that the GOC "has not put forward a view on Intellectual Property" and that this was "unfortunate." He speculated that the issue of copyright, and IP in general, is "so complex, no one wants to touch it in any serious way." Charlie Angus, a Member of Parliament for James Bay and NDP Heritage critic, echoed this sentiment, acknowledging that "IP is complex, and politicians don't like complexity." Angus, who has a background as a band member and advocates musicians' rights, stated that the challenge for Canadian musicians was to "tap into the digital age" and "get our cultural goods onto platforms where they'll be seen." He said musicians need to find a business model that would protect Canadian culture while taking advantage of new media to promote Canadian artists worldwide. Angus also mentioned the need for in Canada for legislation that "is applicable, and works," and that would strike an appropriate balance between industry and consumer interests. 8. (SBU) Sandy Pearlman, a prolific music producer, creator and songwriter who has produced works for Blue Oyster Cult and the Clash, among others, gave an overview of the ways in which the internet has revolutionized access to music and the challenges to copyright. "For the first time," he said, "there is infinite access to infinite music for a quarter of the world's population." Currently, legal, monetized music downloads account for only a fraction of overall internet traffic. Pearlman stated that five cents is the price at which people would rather pay for a download MONTREAL 00000150 003 OF 003 rather than go through the trouble of stealing it. He has advocated a five cent download model, combined with a comprehensive search and recommendation engine, in which the sheer volume of music people would be willing to download at this price point would generate significant revenue for the music industry that is currently being lost to illegal downloads. Pearlman stated that the music industry now finds itself in its current state because music labels did not position themselves to capitalize on new technologies when they had the chance. He predicted that the music industry globally is teetering on the brink of a sea change that would bring nearly universal access to all music, at an extremely low cost, and that this change could also be beneficial for artists and music producers. ------- Comment ------- 9. (SBU) With unlicensed movie uploads and music file-sharing becoming increasingly popular, and legitimate, licensed downloads of music and movies accounting for an extremely small percentage of all internet traffic, the music and entertainment industry worldwide is grappling with the best way to generate revenue with new media and platforms. Efforts to encourage the GOC to ratify its WIPO obligations have been hindered by the sheer complexity of copyright law and IP-related issues, and perceptions by consumers and artists that technological protection measures might be harmful. Post will continue to engage in outreach with Canadian stakeholders across a wide range of sectors to emphasize that copyright protection benefits Canadian artists, that technological protection measures can provide more choice for consumers, and that the prohibition of circumvention devices produces less intrusive and more effective enforcement of copyright.

Raw content
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 MONTREAL 000150 SIPDIS SENSITIVE SIPDIS SECSTATE FOR WHA/CAN, WHA/PD, DS/IP/WHA, EB/TPP/IPE State please pass to USTR for Sullivan, Melle, and Garde E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ECON, ETRD, KIPR, CA SUBJECT: McGill Conference Offers Perspectives on New Media and Copyright Reform This message is Sensitive but Unclassified ------- Summary ------- 1. (SBU) A conference on music and copyright issues entitled "Musical Myopia, Digital Dystopia: New Media and Copyright Reform," hosted by McGill University on March 23, brought together a number of experts in the field of digital rights management and musical technology to discuss the current challenges facing the music industry and the evolving role of intellectual property rights in new media. The conference featured participation from Ann Chaitovitz, Attorney-Advisor at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Bruce Lehman, former Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks in the Clinton Administration, and Michael Geist, a law professor at the University of Ottawa, among others. While Geist's remarks about the adequacy of current Canadian legislation were predictable (Geist is an oft-quoted critic of the Special 301 report and other efforts to encourage Canada to adopt stronger IPR protection), Lehman's comments about the inefficacy of the Digital Media Copyright Act came as a surprise. Although movie piracy (specifically camcording) in Montreal has received widespread press coverage in recent months, the issue of copyright protection for music (and technical protection measures in general) also remains a hot issue. Ms. Chaitovitz underscored how U.S. copyright law evolved to incorporate new media, explained the difference between rights limitations and access limitations within U.S. copyright law, and offered examples of how consumers have benefited from copyright protection by being able to pay more selectively for the services they want. The points of view expressed by some participants have been used to justify GOC resistance to changing its copyright legislation and ratifying the WIPO Internet Treaties. Some conference participants stated that copyright issues remain oversimplified by policymakers and misunderstood by the general public. Post will continue to engage stakeholders in multiple sectors about the importance of implementing the WIPO internet treaties. ------------- Canada's IPR "Public Intellectual" rails against anti-circumvention ------------ 2. (SBU) Geist, regarded by some academics as Canada's "public intellectual" on intellectual property issues and internet law, has published a number of editorials casting doubt on figures related to Canada's share of global film piracy. Geist maintains a blog in which he tackles issues related to new technologies and their legal ramifications and intellectual property issues more generally and has argued against the inclusion of anti-circumvention provisions in Canadian law (see http://www.michaelgeist.ca/index.php). Such provisions, which exist in U.S. law, would ban the manufacture of devices that could be used to "pick digital locks." Geist made a "case against Canadian Anti-Circumvention legislation," contending that anti-circumvention devices are harmful, run counter to the free market, are ineffective, and are unnecessary. 3. (SBU) Geist outlined the changes occurring in the world of digital media on the internet, such as the presence of 70 million blogs, the development of services such as myspace, youtube, webcasts and podcasts that all facilitated audio and video file sharing, to conclude that "those involved in WIPO guessed wrong" about the need to control digital copying. Geist stated that anti-circumvention devices could be harmful to the software and materials they were created to protect. He also said that many Canadian artists do not want to see legislation enacted that would facilitate lawsuits against fans. Geist pointed to the creation of the Canadian Music Creators' Coalition, which claims to be a "growing coalition of Canadian music creators who share the common goal of having our voices heard about the laws and policies that affect our livelihoods," including artists such as Sarah McLaughlan, Avril Lavigne, and the Barenaked Ladies, as evidence of this trend. Some music groups, such as Broken Social Scene, have credited new technology and file sharing mechanisms for facilitating their popularity. ------- An architect of the DMCA proclaims a "post-copyright" era ------- 4. (SBU) Mr. Lehman, one of the self-proclaimed "architects" of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) as well as the WIPO Internet treaties, stated that the music world has entered the "post-copyright era" and that existing copyright mechanisms had failed to respond to the evolution of the internet. Mr. Lehman's comments could be interpreted narrowly to mean that the "copyright" MONTREAL 00000150 002 OF 003 era has come to a close because the genie of digital music is already out of the copyright bottle. Lehman went on to say that Canada should not be constrained by what was done in the United States and blasted the U.S. government process. He said that under U.S. law, individuals are held responsible for file-sharing activities because the big corporations, like the internet service providers (ISPs), lobbied to exempt themselves. He suggested that Canada take a new approach that allegedly could not have been accomplished in the U.S. because of powerful interests, and urging Canada to play an outside role as a cauldron of creativity and culture. --------- Defending the DMCA -------- 5. (SBU) Ms. Chaitovitz stressed the need for the prohibition in manufacture and trafficking of circumvention devices, and noted that such prohibition leads to more effective and less intrusive enforcement of copyright infringement. With regard to technological protection measures, Ms. Chaitovitz said that U.S. law does not require creators to install such devices in their products, and that individual enterprises decide if they wish to protect their material in this way. She also made the distinction between rights limitations and access limitations, with rights controls limiting what consumers can do with purchased materials and access controls determining which consumers can gain access to a particular product or service through subscription services. Ms. Chaitovitz noted that many new digital business models offering consumers more choice and flexibility (such as music subscription services or Netflix offering access to on-demand-streaming movies) rely on access controls. She stated that content owners will be more willing to provide such services only if they are confident that their rights will be protected. Ms. Chaitovitz stressed aspects of U.S. copyright protections work well, and how such protections have benefited consumers, artists, and content providers alike. 6. (SBU) Charles Morgan, a lawyer for McCarthy Tetrault, made the case for Canada to ratify the WIPO internet treaties and bring itself up to the "international standard" for copyright protection. He noted that the massive technological changes the world has undergone had brought about an "imbalance in traditional copyright" and that copyright protection is necessary in order to ensure those who create works are paid for their efforts. Canada, he said, should "act in a manner consistent with all of its trading partners," including the U.S. and the EU, by amending its laws to conform with WIPO requirements. Morgan also noted that Bill C-60, which the GOC had proposed but not adopted in 2005 under the Liberal government, would have ranked among the developed world world's weakest WIPO-implementing legislation. Geist responded to Morgan's remarks by noting that Canadians "must be very clear about what commitments we took on by signing [WIPO]-none." ------- Copyright and the GOC ------- 7. (SBU) Sunny Handa, a conference moderator and McGill Law Professor noted that the GOC "has not put forward a view on Intellectual Property" and that this was "unfortunate." He speculated that the issue of copyright, and IP in general, is "so complex, no one wants to touch it in any serious way." Charlie Angus, a Member of Parliament for James Bay and NDP Heritage critic, echoed this sentiment, acknowledging that "IP is complex, and politicians don't like complexity." Angus, who has a background as a band member and advocates musicians' rights, stated that the challenge for Canadian musicians was to "tap into the digital age" and "get our cultural goods onto platforms where they'll be seen." He said musicians need to find a business model that would protect Canadian culture while taking advantage of new media to promote Canadian artists worldwide. Angus also mentioned the need for in Canada for legislation that "is applicable, and works," and that would strike an appropriate balance between industry and consumer interests. 8. (SBU) Sandy Pearlman, a prolific music producer, creator and songwriter who has produced works for Blue Oyster Cult and the Clash, among others, gave an overview of the ways in which the internet has revolutionized access to music and the challenges to copyright. "For the first time," he said, "there is infinite access to infinite music for a quarter of the world's population." Currently, legal, monetized music downloads account for only a fraction of overall internet traffic. Pearlman stated that five cents is the price at which people would rather pay for a download MONTREAL 00000150 003 OF 003 rather than go through the trouble of stealing it. He has advocated a five cent download model, combined with a comprehensive search and recommendation engine, in which the sheer volume of music people would be willing to download at this price point would generate significant revenue for the music industry that is currently being lost to illegal downloads. Pearlman stated that the music industry now finds itself in its current state because music labels did not position themselves to capitalize on new technologies when they had the chance. He predicted that the music industry globally is teetering on the brink of a sea change that would bring nearly universal access to all music, at an extremely low cost, and that this change could also be beneficial for artists and music producers. ------- Comment ------- 9. (SBU) With unlicensed movie uploads and music file-sharing becoming increasingly popular, and legitimate, licensed downloads of music and movies accounting for an extremely small percentage of all internet traffic, the music and entertainment industry worldwide is grappling with the best way to generate revenue with new media and platforms. Efforts to encourage the GOC to ratify its WIPO obligations have been hindered by the sheer complexity of copyright law and IP-related issues, and perceptions by consumers and artists that technological protection measures might be harmful. Post will continue to engage in outreach with Canadian stakeholders across a wide range of sectors to emphasize that copyright protection benefits Canadian artists, that technological protection measures can provide more choice for consumers, and that the prohibition of circumvention devices produces less intrusive and more effective enforcement of copyright.
Metadata
VZCZCXRO0952 RR RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHQU RUEHVC DE RUEHMT #0150/01 0901349 ZNR UUUUU ZZH R 311349Z MAR 07 FM AMCONSUL MONTREAL TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0527 INFO RUCNCAN/ALCAN COLLECTIVE RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
Print

You can use this tool to generate a print-friendly PDF of the document 07MONTREAL150_a.





Share

The formal reference of this document is 07MONTREAL150_a, please use it for anything written about this document. This will permit you and others to search for it.


Submit this story


References to this document in other cables References in this document to other cables
07OTTAWA691

If the reference is ambiguous all possibilities are listed.

Help Expand The Public Library of US Diplomacy

Your role is important:
WikiLeaks maintains its robust independence through your contributions.

Please see
https://shop.wikileaks.org/donate to learn about all ways to donate.


e-Highlighter

Click to send permalink to address bar, or right-click to copy permalink.

Tweet these highlights

Un-highlight all Un-highlight selectionu Highlight selectionh

XHelp Expand The Public
Library of US Diplomacy

Your role is important:
WikiLeaks maintains its robust independence through your contributions.

Please see
https://shop.wikileaks.org/donate to learn about all ways to donate.